Standing orders under state law
Does Montana law let a medic push scheduled drugs on standing orders, the way the DEA rule assumes?
- Status
- Yes
- Citation
- ARM 24.156.2771(2)(a); ARM 24.156.2701 (definition of Offline medical direction)
- Detail
- A Montana AEMT or paramedic may perform any act within their licensure level under the medical oversight of a medical director, and the rules define that oversight as capable of being offline — general supervision rather than real-time orders.
Partly supported
Montana never uses the phrase 'standing orders' in its emergency care provider rules, which is why this is partial rather than full. What it has instead is a two-part structure: the scope rule quoted here authorises practice under a medical director's oversight, and ARM 24.156.2701 defines 'Offline medical direction' as 'general medical oversight and supervision for an emergency medical service or an ECP' as against 'Online medical control', which it defines as 'real-time interactive medical advice or orders'. Offline direction is therefore the recognised mode and does not require the physician present. The Board of Medical Examiners' Montana ECP Scope of Practice document adds that the use of a specific medication 'must align with clinical scope of practice, clinical protocols approved by a Medical Director', which is the medication-specific link, but it too stops short of naming controlled substances. Source note: rules.mt.gov, the official rule host, returns an empty document to every non-browser client, so the citation is the Board of Medical Examiners' own compiled chapter PDF, current as of 30 September 2022.
Source quotation
An ECP licensed at an EMT with endorsement(s), AEMT, or paramedic level may perform any acts allowed within the ECP's licensure level or endorsement level when: (a) under medical oversight of a medical director who is taking responsibility for the ECP;
boards.bsd.dli.mt.gov · State administrative code